Feb. 3rd, 2008

I posted this to rec.arts.sf.fandom, but what the heck, I'll put it here too.

A while back someone -- I think on Making Light -- posted a link to an article in the LA Times about a dark chocolate taste test. It seems to be registration only (and/or bugmenot) now. Anyway, I read it at the time and was interested to see that my favorite chocolate, Valrhona "Le Noir Amer", came in second.

(Which stirs the memory: it *was* on Making Light, because a regular there said something along the lines of, "Good ole Hershey's Special Dark wasn't pretentious enough to make the list, eh?" Which sparked an argument that more-or-less ended with me declaring, "There is a reason that Hershey's isn't on the list, and pretension isn't it.")

So then I was quite interested to taste the number one on the list, Michel Cluizel "Noir de Cacao". I figured I could get them at my local upscale grocery, or at Whole Foods, but I was surprised to find it at neither place. Today I had an opportunity to visit a specialty chocolate cafe in north Oakland, and they had it, so I bought some.

I have to say that I'm not disappointed. It's an excellent chocolate, somewhat more assertive and earthy than the Valrhona. (I could say more but I'd risk sounding like a wine snob...although it's quite possibly too late there.)

Unfortunately for it, to get it I have to make a special trip to a place I don't normally go and spend $6.95, whereas the Valrhona I can buy for $2.99 when I'm getting groceries at Trader Joe's. So Michel Cluizel will be an occasional guest in my kitchen, but not a permanent resident.

Profile

davidgoldfarb: (Default)
davidgoldfarb

January 2021

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 10th, 2025 05:49 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios